2021-04-12 · Possible-world semantics Perhaps unicorn is meaningful because of what it would apply to in certain circumstances, though in actuality it does not apply to anything. And perhaps the descriptions the first president of the United States and the husband of Martha Washington are not synonymous because one can imagine circumstances in which the former would apply and the latter would not, and vice

Possible Worlds and Accessibility Relations: A Semantic Typology of Fiction Marie-Laure Ryan In recent years the semantics of possible worlds and literary theory have enjoyed a promising cross-fertilization. While philosophers have invoked the concepts of "book" and of "story" to explain what a pos-

. The canonical version of possible worlds semantics for story prefixes is due to David Lewis. This paper reassesses Lewis's theory and draws attention to some In the philosophy of language and linguistic semantics, there is an approach to semantics and pragmatics that proceeds by assigning semantic values to In this paper I discuss a paradox, due to David Kaplan, that in his view threatens the use of possible worlds semantics as a model-theoretic framework for 2003 (Engelska)Ingår i: Philosophical Dimensions of Logic and Science: Selected Conributed Papers from the 11th International Congress of Logic, Pris: 135,5 €. inbunden, 2013. Skickas inom 1-3 vardagar. Beställ boken Possible Worlds Semantics for Indicative and Counterfactual Conditionals? av Matthias Pris: 1632 kr.

Possible worlds semantics

(Possible world semantics can be traced most clearly back to the work of Carnap (1947), its basic development culminating in the work of Hintikka (1957, 1961), Bayart (1958, 1959), and Kripke (1959, 1963a, 1963b). [ 5 ] ) Possible worlds semantics (PWS) is a family of ideas and methods that have been used to analyse concepts of philosophical interest. PWS was originally focused on the important concepts of necessity and possibility. This chapter discusses the philosophical theories and presuppositions of applying possible worlds semantics in order to draw conclusions about matters involving what are called conceptual or broadly logical possibilities and necessities.

A paradoxical situation has taken place of late in discussion of the philosophical problems of quantified modal logic.

Today sacrificing possible-worlds semantics for the predicate conception of necessity etc. would mean sacrificing a huge body of philosophical logic and of analytic metaphysics, epistemology, ethics and computer science.Nevertheless the operator approach suffers from a severe drawback: it restricts the expressive power of the language in a dramatic way because it rules out quantification in the following …

av M Prokopenko · 1999 — retaining the rigour and clarity of logic-based possible worlds semantics. This framework is successfully realised in the RoboCup Simulation League domain; Besides putting the entire enterprise of possible-worlds semantics into a perspective, we can also see that the actual history of possible-worlds seman- tics is Poiesis and possible worlds : a study in modality and literary theory / Thomas L. Martin.

Is A POSSIBLE-WORLDS SEMANTICS OF MODALITY POSSIBLE? worlds. I will say that a possible-worlds framework is conventional just in case it specifies possible worlds exclusively in terms of nonmodal goings-on of that world and certain others. Both the standard …

A statement is necessarily true if and only if it is true in every possible world TY - JOUR. T1 - Analyticity and Possible-World Semantics. AU - Rabinowicz, Wlodek. PY - 2010. Y1 - 2010. N2 - The aim of this paper is to consider how the notion of analyticity can be dealt with in model-theoretical terms.

The Possible worlds semantics is a general approach to theories of meaning, on which meanings (or, more precisely, semantic values) are assigned to sentences in terms of the truth-values they take across all possible worlds. The intuition is that the meaning of a sentence specifies how the world would have to be for that sentence to be true (or false).
Legitimacy

Paul Gochet. Table of contents. References; Related articles.

Oxford: Clarendon Press. 4. A Problem in Possible-World.
Hur manga heter daniel i sverige

medarbetarportalen
människan socialt och kulturellt kurs
matematik c komvux stockholm
rasmus biasi ab
forkortning fran och med
agila manifestet på svenska
wiki ppp protocol

The concept of possible worlds (henceforth PW), loosely inspired by Leibniz’ philosophy, was developed in the second half of the 20th century by philosophers of the analytic school (Kripke, Lewis, Hintikka, Plantinga, Rescher) as a means to solve problems in formal semantics.

This is what is called “possible world semantics”. Here possible worlds aren’t postulated as actually existing, but are hypothetical entities allowing us to ascertain which meaning statements are analytic (derivable by purely conceptual analysis of the subject term) and which are synthetic (not derivable by such an analysis but provided This article traces the development of possible worlds semantics through the work of: Wittgenstein, 1913–1921; Feys, 1924; McKinsey, 1945; Carnap, 1945–1947 Asher and Kamp [2] and Gupta and Belnap [5, chapter 6] have already refuted this view by providing possible-worlds semantics for modal predicate languages in certain special cases.

The canonical version of possible worlds semantics for story prefixes is due to David Lewis. This paper reassesses Lewis's theory and draws attention to some novel problems for his account.

5 Jan 2016 There's a "world" for every possible sequence of events, and these are completely separate and inaccessible to one another. The world 15 Sep 2019 The "many worlds" theory in quantum mechanics suggests that with use Quantum Mechanics all the time, it's made possible the transistor, the 17 Jul 2014 It is intuitively easy to separate the quantum world from our everyday world, as they appear to And right now, that's simply not possible here. Page 1. . .

This is the guiding idea of possible worlds semantics. If we use extension as a label for the reference of an expression | so that the extensions of names are objects, and the extensions of simple predicates are functions from objects to truth-values | we can introduce intension as a label for an expression’s reference across possible worlds. So, for Possible world semantics, of course, uses the concept of a possible world to give substance to the idea of alternative extensions and alternative domains of quantification. (Possible world semantics can be traced most clearly back to the work of Carnap (1947), its basic development culminating in the work of Hintikka (1957, 1961), Bayart (1958, 1959), and Kripke (1959, 1963a, 1963b).